Free tool · no sign-up
Most AI crawlers never run your JavaScript. We fetch your page exactly the way they do, then show you what is left — the words they can read, the crawlers you are blocking, and what to fix first.
SEO tools assume a crawler that renders your page. AI crawlers mostly don't. This scores the harsher, more honest case.
Does the page answer a plain, non-browser request — and does your robots.txt let in the crawlers that feed live answers?
Are the words in the HTML, or assembled by JavaScript the crawler will never execute?
Is the content shaped into passages a model can lift — clear headings, direct answers, structured data?
Can it tell who you are and when this was last true, so it is willing to name you as the source?
Coming soon
A Chrome extension that shows a page's AI-readability the moment you land on it — yours or a competitor's. Same engine as this page, no tab switching.
In build. Tell us where to send it and you'll get it first.
Most AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript. If your page builds its content in the browser, the crawler receives an almost empty HTML shell — your site looks perfect to you and close to blank to the model. The other common cause is robots.txt: plenty of sites block AI crawlers without realising which of them feed the answers people see today.
No. An SEO audit assumes a rendering crawler like Googlebot, which does run your JavaScript. This checks the harsher case: a non-rendering fetch, the crawler allow-list that governs AI answers, and whether your content is shaped into passages a model can quote and attribute.
It is a rights decision, not a mistake, so we do not score it against you. Blocking training crawlers keeps your content out of future model weights — which is where long-term brand recall comes from — but it does not affect live answers. The crawlers that matter for answers today are OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, Claude-User, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended.
Every check shows the evidence it scored on, so you can verify it yourself. What we cannot observe, we do not assert: we read one page's raw HTML, robots.txt, llms.txt and sitemap, and we say so. It is a diagnostic, not a ranking prediction — nobody can promise a model's output.
No. The audit runs on request, returns the result and keeps nothing. No sign-up, no database, no follow-up email unless you ask for one.
We run a growth engine that tests, learns and compounds — on our own sites first, then on yours.
Talk to us